The Open LC Community for and by LC Specialists

[Home]

Inside lcviews.com

 
Library

 

Who's Who in LC World

 

Single Window

 

High Profile

 

Global

 

Devil lies in the detail

 

Eye of the hurricane

 

Traders corner

 

LC Action

 

Contact and Editorial Board

 

Inter-web tour

 

  SWQ_79
24
.4.2008
LC documents versus Selected Incoterm
  Question: Name: Dominique Simpson-Jones

I would like to know whether your experts would agree with the following view:

"- Buyers (or their banks) often call for documents required for import clearance (certificates of origin, of inspection, sanitary, veterinary certificates, etc.). However, documents that may be claimed under a credit should only correspond to the seller's obligations under the Incoterm applicable to the contract. Except under DDP Incoterm (*), these documents intended for import clearance are not part of the seller's obligations and should therefore neither be required in the credit nor submitted to the banks' examination.

(*) In any case, since a documentary credit is supposed to link the payment to the shipment of the goods, DDP is not consistent with this technique of payment, which should preferably be replaced by a SWIFT transfer accompanied by a bank guarantee such as a standby letter of credit unless there is a governmental regulation that imposes settlement through an L/C.

- The seller might consider clarifying this issue during commercial negotiation and propose one of two alternatives:

. he sends these documents directly to the buyer if their relationship is trustworthy, or

. should the issuing bank insist on their surrender, he clearly indicates in his pre-instructions for the credit opening that they will be stated in field 47A of the SWIFT MT700 as accompanying documents and will thereby not be checked by banks for compliance against other documents stipulated in the credit."

Many thanks for your answer.

Best regards.

 

 
  Answer (from Abdulkader Bazara) It has always been stressed that the contract between seller and buyer should both parties' requirements. If the contract is comprehensive and covers the special requirements of the buyer and the regulatory requirements of the importing and exporting countries, there would not, usually, be surprises at the time of issuance of the credit. Incoterms do not cover all requirements for concluding a deal between two parties. They are fairly general terms and sometimes, unless supplemented, may cover the minimum requirements (e.g. insurance requirement).

Banks usually follow the terms stipulated by applicants in the standard bank application forms which usually contain some of the requirements imposed by the regulatory bodies in the country they domicile. Though, as stated above, all issues (including those standard requirements in LC applications) related to the terms and conditions of the credit must be agreed upon prior to establishing an LC, a seller who does not agree to the terms and conditions stipulated in the credit received should contact the buyer in time and ask for an amendment if feasible; otherwise, the contracting parties should look for alternative methods to conclude their deals. Parties should not keep their differences until the last minute.

Best Regards

Abdulkader