|
Dear Shoury
Morgan,
Thanks for
using the single window.
It is a good
question.
First of all I
would like to quote UCP 600 sub-article 12(a) for you:
Unless a
nominated bank is the confirming bank, an authorization to honour or
negotiate does not impose any obligation on that nominated bank to honour or
negotiate, except when expressly agreed to by that nominated bank and so
communicated to the beneficiary.
What this
sub-article says is that a non-confirming bank has no obligation under the
LC – unless agreed to. Therefore your banker is “allowed” to merely forward
the document without examining them.
Note however
that practice differ much here. In the region where I work it is common that
the advising banks (regardless if being a confirming bank) examine the
documents – in order to cure any discrepancies before they reach the issuing
bank.
If the
documents are not examined at your end – they may be refused by the issuing
bank if they contain discrepancies – and if those are not waived by the
applicant – they may return the documents to you (and you will need to
figure out what to do with the goods).
My best advice
to you, is to check if there is another bank in your country that would be
willing (subject to a fee) to examine the documents. Check also your LC for
the availability:
-
Is it (only)
available with the issuing bank, or
-
Is there
nominated a named bank, or
-
Is it
available with any bank?
Often banks
would be more comfortable examining documents if they are nominated under
the LC.
In you query
you mentioned that they would send the documents “for collection”. I would
also advise you to check what they mean by that exactly. If they are sending
them under the ICC Rules for Collections (URC 522) – then you should
consider carefully whether or not to accept it.
It is important
that the documents are forwarded to the issuing bank under the LC –
regardless if they contain discrepancies or not. For example the issuing
bank is precluded from claiming that the documents are not complying with LC
terms if they have not provide a notice of refusal after a maximum of five
banking days following the day of presentation.
Such rule would
not apply if they are clearly sent as a collection.
I hope this
helps you.
Best regards
Kim Christensen
|